WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a Senate Select Intelligence Committee (SSCI) hearing, U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME) pressed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on whether or not classified information was shared in a Signal chain made up of top national security and intelligence officials discussing plans of a military attack on Houthi militants — and, inadvertently, Jeffery Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic. The hearing comes the day after The Atlantic published a story revealing that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz accidentally added Goldberg to the chain where potentially classified information was discussed — including plans about strategic strikes in Yemen that were later carried out.

“According to open source reporting, at 11:44 on the morning of March 15th, Secretary Hegseth put into this group text a detailed operation plan including targets, the weapons we were going to be using, attack sequences and timing. Yet you have testified that nothing in that text chain was classified. Wouldn't that be classified? What if that had been made public that morning before the attack took place,” asked Senator King.

“Senator, I can attest to the fact that there were no classified or intelligence equities that were included in that chat at any time,” replied Director Gabbard.

“So the attack sequencing and timing and weapons, you do not consider should have been classified, or were classified,” Senator King asked again.

“I defer to Secretary of Defense and the National Security Council on that question,” responded Director Gabbard.

“Well you’re the head of the Intelligence Community and you’re supposed to know about classifications so your testimony very clearly today was that nothing in that set of texts that was classified. If that is the case, please release the whole text stream so that the public can have a view of what actually transpired on this discussion. It is hard for me to believe that targets and timing and weapons would not have been classified,” said Senator King.

Later in the hearing, Senator King, co-chair of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission (CSC), questioned Director Gabbard about the sweepings cuts being made at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Specifically, he asked her about the dismantling of federal efforts to monitor election interreference from foreign adversaries like Russia and China, and whether or not that posed a risk to the nation’s cybersecurity defenses.

“It is in the report repeatedly about cyber danger from China, Russia and Iran. Why then is the administration deconstructing CISA? 130 people fired. [U.S. CyberCom Commander] General Haugh talked about the importance of public-private cooperation. That section of CISA seems to have been disestablished. What possible policy reason is there for undermining CISA's relationship to the states with regard to elections and to private sector with regard to cybersecurity when the cybersecurity threat is only growing? Anybody want to tackle that,” questioned Senator King.

“I will not speak for all of my colleagues here but I don't believe any of us have any insight into those specific staffing decisions that have been made,” said Director Gabbard.

“Well let me ask you this question: The report has found explicitly growing cyber threats — including to elections — from Russia, China, and Iran. Do you believe it is in our national interest to diminish our capacity to deal with those cyber issues, yes or no,” Senator King asked.

“President Trump is focused on effects and making sure that the people and the resources that we have are focused on our national security. He and his team recognized that more people does not necessarily always mean better effects. Those are some of the things that are driving the changes we are seeing across the administration, is getting all of our agencies back and focused on their core mission,” replied Director Gabbard.

Senator King has been consistently sounding the alarm on President Donald Trump’s existential threat to the Constitution, as well as the reckless actions taken by the President and his Administration. He previously gave a speech on the Senate floor sharing that this administration is doing ‘exactly what the Framers [of the Constitution] most feared.” Senator King also previously declared that the proposal to halt all federal grant and loan disbursement was illegal and a direct assault on the Constitution. He also joined fellow Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) colleagues in writing a letter to the White House about the risks to national security by allowing unvetted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staff and representatives to access classified and sensitive government materials. Most recently, he sounded the alarm on the Senate floor on the “thoughtless and dangerous” firings and freezes being implemented by Elon Musks’ DOGE.

King is recognized as one of Congress’ leading experts on cyberdefense and as a strong advocate for a forward-thinking cyberstrategy that emphasizes layered cyberdeterrence. Since it officially launched in April 2019, dozens of CSC recommendations have been enacted into law, including the creation of a National Cyber Director.

###